Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts

Friday, June 19, 2009

Waco in Iran?

Once again Waco is brought up in the media in relation to the Branch Davidian siege of the early 1990's. This time it was done by none other than the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The remarks came in his widely anticipated Friday prayer at Tehran University.

Iran's supreme leader defends election @ CNN.com

  • "He even made an apparent reference to the deaths of people -- what he called the "burning alive" of 80 men, women and children -- during the federal siege of the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, Texas, in 1993."

I would like to point out, as I have so many times before, this happened outside Waco city limits and NOT in Waco. I think the Ayatollah should worry about the thousands of revolutionists marching against him and leave the 254 out of it.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Twitter's Edge in Iran

Check this link out.

Twitter 1, Censors 0

This is a great article to follow up "Net Warfare." Provides wonderful insight into why Twitter is being used so successfully in Iran to report the news while everything else is being censored out. Mainly it describes why Iran’s government can’t beat it.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

"Net Warfare": The New Age of Revolution

The first point I want to make is I will be using the word “revolution” a lot to coincide with the Pro-Moussavi protesters and what they are trying to accomplish. I know it is yet to be seen if this is indeed a true “revolution” in the dictionary sense of “a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, esp. one made suddenly and often accompanied by violence.” That is the sociology definition and I would love to make a case that things in Iran will never be the same, but that’s not what we are discussing here. Maybe another day…

What I want to talk about is “Net Warfare.” I think the most intriguing fact of what is happening in Iran right now is how technology is completely shaping this entire affair. I am going to bullet my points to make this easier.

  • Almost immediately after the results were released, that Ahmadinejad had won by a landslide, young adults, who make up around 70% of Iran’s population, hit the streets in protest.
  • The “Green Revolutionists”, in relation to the color of the reformist movement, needed a way to create a unified front so they Twitted, Facebooked and blogged meeting times and locations for protests and gatherings.
  • The government, in seeing what was happening, attempted to shut down the internet inside Iran, but they forgot (most likely because they can’t shut down service) about cell phones…
  • Stories and pictures started pouring out of Iran about the revolution and the way the police and baseej militia, a group of plain clothed civilians with sticks backed by the pro-government Revolutionary Guard, were handling it.
  • Pictures of hundreds of thousands of Iranians marching at Freedom Square in Tehran, young adults being beating by sticks of the baseej militia, blood stained hands of men carrying the wounded after shots rang out from militia strongholds.
  • Side note: I think the fact that Iran actually has a militia, backed by the Revolutionary Guard, which is the main policing force in Iran, is absurd. If I was a dictator I would not have a militia, I would stick to the Guard.
  • The government banned all foreign and homegrown journalists from writing or capturing any of the protests on film. They shut down several of the foreign media offices in Tehran and even started arresting journalists and cameramen.
  • State run news casting would show short clips of the “marches” and downplay their importance or relevance.
  • But they couldn’t stop Twitter. Yes, Twitter. Scores and scores of Iranians would use their cell phones to post their stories, their pictures and their revolutionary ideals on the website that was made famous by Aston Kutcher’s ring and ditch deal with CNN.
  • Soon you hear about so called pro-government agents searching though Twitter, posting false propaganda, trying to battle the hundreds of thousand Iranians who are using the internet as a tool of their revolution.
  • The revolutionaries start posting to not name names or post faces due to stories circulating of mass arrests and disappearing students in the middle of the night. Sounds like “Remember the 5th of November” doesn’t it.
  • In a flanking move, the revolutionaries launch attacks on pro-government sites using DDOS, or distributed denial of service; tactics bringing down several state run news websites.
  • Side note: In a devil’s advocate role, what the revolutionaries seem to be doing is blocking the state’s freedom of speech, a goal of they seem to be fighting for.
  • Side side note: You could argue the state is using fake propaganda and all is fair in love, war and revolutions.

Where will this all lead? Only time will tell. This is where we stand as I write this. And this is only a small fraction of examples of “Net Warfare” being used within the conflict of Iran.

I do not want to overshadow the battles that seem to be ranging on the streets of Tehran and other cities around Iran. However, how interesting is it to watch the world’s first true use of citizen run “Net Warfare.”

If Ahmadinejad’s government can’t stop the revolutionaries’ use of technology I would argue that he and the Ayatollah Khamenei will have a hard time putting this revolt down without “having a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure.” And yes, I did just tie that back to revolution.

_____________________________________________________


** I had written this article two days ago when news first starting breaking of this new citizen based warfare and had planned on updating and posting sooner. But every news outlet in the world beat me to it. Here are some better written and more informative articles that deal with issues on this topic.**

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1905125,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8104318.stm
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20060516_iranian_opposition_ddos_pro_ahmadinejad_sites/

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Great Blog

The Lede NY Times Blog

If you have free time on your hands and want to get in-depth news fast regarding the current situation in Iran, check it out.

From the Rooftop


This video is pretty amazing. Ran across it in looking up information for a post to come. You can't but help imagine the feeling these people have through the support of distant voices. 

Made me think of some David Crowder lyrics...

"We'll shout it from the rooftops,
We won't we quiet,
We've fallen for you hard and we can't stop,
We won't deny it."

The Right of the People

I hear a lot of people on the radio and see a lot of people on the Internet saying “what does it matter if Moussavi does end becoming president of Iran and Ahmadinejad is ousted. Moussavi is no more pro-west than Ahmadinejad is and both stand for Iran’s right to have nuclear power.” They also seem to agree with Obama’s “no-meddling” stance on the issue.

I would have to disagree. I think the reason we should be supporting the people who are protesting their right of freedom is because there are obvious signs that the government ran a corrupt election. This shouldn’t be about who America wants to be in office. Who America thinks is best for Iran. It should be about what the people of Iran think is best. It should be about whom the people of Iran vote into office and the freedoms they feel like they deserve. I don’t think there is a clear answer on whom that Iranian man might be solely because of how suspicious this election was, how quickly it was announced and how lopsided the results were, among other things. I think the response of the Iranian government to the allegations of impropriety make me want to call bullshit. And I have to ask myself since when did America stop “meddling” for the right of freedom?